Barnard fink court records in virginia

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or OrderFiling 5 Mail sent to Adam Fink Returned as Undeliverable. (dvanm)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or OrderFiling 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Adam Fink. (kgall)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or OrderFiling 3 ORDERED that the petition be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order. ORDERED that petitioner either pay the filing fee, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 1/19/2022. (kgall) (C/M of Order and IFP application to Plaintiff)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or OrderFiling 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (kgall) (C/M to plaintiff)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or OrderFiling 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Adam Fink. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Sheet, #2 Legal Arguments, #3 Envelope)(kgall)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fink v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Fink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.